Best Known (82, 165, s)-Nets in Base 3
(82, 165, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 165, 64)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 109, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 56, 28)-net over F3, using
(82, 165, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (82, 165, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 165, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(82, 165, 614)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 165, 615)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 164, 615)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 861170 098429 767204 112394 997640 974648 715029 564975 619750 674265 288103 571924 204671 > 3164 [i]