Best Known (86, 173, s)-Nets in Base 3
(86, 173, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 173, 65)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 174, 65)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 115, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 59, 28)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(86, 173, 87)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (86, 173, 87)-net over F3, using
(86, 173, 642)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 173, 643)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 172, 643)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 12090 244253 159479 399121 986983 597034 043499 491927 129420 368664 738958 022177 555897 641435 > 3172 [i]