Best Known (93, 174, s)-Nets in Base 3
(93, 174, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 174, 73)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (26, 66, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 108, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 66, 36)-net over F3, using
(93, 174, 108)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (93, 174, 108)-net over F3, using
(93, 174, 873)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 174, 874)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 173, 874)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 35046 186745 257857 882465 597141 449666 681839 979094 466726 457442 026094 665432 288282 868241 > 3173 [i]