Best Known (88, 183, s)-Nets in Base 3
(88, 183, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 183, 64)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 62, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 121, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 62, 28)-net over F3, using
(88, 183, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (88, 183, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 183, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(88, 183, 601)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 183, 602)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 182, 602)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 713 294750 859439 739084 508740 617939 441497 990165 462867 118626 923048 011271 674511 316884 553081 > 3182 [i]