Best Known (159, 192, s)-Nets in Base 3
(159, 192, 896)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 192, 896)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (157, 192, 896)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 48, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 48, 224)-net over F81, using
(159, 192, 5374)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (159, 192, 5374)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3192, 5374, F3, 33) (dual of [5374, 5182, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3192, 6616, F3, 33) (dual of [6616, 6424, 34]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3193, 6617, F3, 34) (dual of [6617, 6424, 35]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(25) [i] based on
- linear OA(3177, 6561, F3, 34) (dual of [6561, 6384, 35]-code), using an extension Ce(33) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6560 = 38−1, defining interval I = [1,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(3137, 6561, F3, 26) (dual of [6561, 6424, 27]-code), using an extension Ce(25) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6560 = 38−1, defining interval I = [1,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(316, 56, F3, 7) (dual of [56, 40, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(316, 82, F3, 7) (dual of [82, 66, 8]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(25) [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3193, 6617, F3, 34) (dual of [6617, 6424, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3192, 6616, F3, 33) (dual of [6616, 6424, 34]-code), using
(159, 192, 1687095)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 192, 1687096)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 191, 1687096)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13 494627 737477 008848 981135 642759 101311 148435 321783 720469 271119 513802 261664 802347 919331 039233 > 3191 [i]