Best Known (102, 195, s)-Nets in Base 3
(102, 195, 74)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 195, 74)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (102, 198, 74)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 75, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 123, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3 (see above)
- digital (27, 75, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(102, 195, 112)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (102, 195, 112)-net over F3, using
(102, 195, 880)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 195, 881)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 194, 881)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 364 838264 235832 632032 958353 916336 448294 729427 857335 864429 164376 553177 237338 525024 946970 823513 > 3194 [i]