Best Known (103, 195, s)-Nets in Base 3
(103, 195, 74)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 195, 74)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (103, 201, 74)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 76, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 125, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3 (see above)
- digital (27, 76, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(103, 195, 115)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (103, 195, 115)-net over F3, using
(103, 195, 903)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 195, 904)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1129 553247 463499 369245 121894 762304 902422 890857 115098 381315 532821 632131 003381 849956 527542 790065 > 3195 [i]