Best Known (190, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(190, 202, 5592564)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 202, 5592564)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (16, 22, 164)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 11, 82)-net over F9, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(5,81) in PG(10,9)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 6, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(5,81) in PG(10,9)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 6, 82)-net over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 11, 82)-net over F9, using
- digital (168, 180, 5592400)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (78, 90, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(990, 2796200, F9, 14, 12) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146710, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(990, 8388601, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777112, 13]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(990, 8388602, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777114, 13]-NRT-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8145, 4194301, F81, 2, 12) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388557, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8145, 8388602, F81, 12) (dual of [8388602, 8388557, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8145, large, F81, 12) (dual of [large, large−45, 13]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8145, large, F81, 12) (dual of [large, large−45, 13]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8145, 8388602, F81, 12) (dual of [8388602, 8388557, 13]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8145, 4194301, F81, 2, 12) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388557, 13]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(990, 8388602, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777114, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(990, 8388601, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777112, 13]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(990, 2796200, F9, 14, 12) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146710, 13]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (78, 90, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- digital (16, 22, 164)-net over F3, using
(190, 202, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (190, 202, large)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (186, 202, large)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (186, 203, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3203, large, F3, 17) (dual of [large, large−203, 18]-code), using
- 37 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3166, large, F3, 17) (dual of [large, large−166, 18]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- 37 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3166, large, F3, 17) (dual of [large, large−166, 18]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3203, large, F3, 17) (dual of [large, large−203, 18]-code), using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (186, 203, large)-net over F3, using
(190, 202, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 202, large)-net in base 3, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (190, 192, large)-net in base 3, but