Best Known (89, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(89, 202, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 202, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
(89, 202, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 202, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
(89, 202, 506)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 202, 507)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 201, 507)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 828910 362165 645539 541275 854555 858710 556648 502592 779810 229345 037065 308580 916372 291677 530981 625105 > 3201 [i]