Best Known (166, 203, s)-Nets in Base 3
(166, 203, 896)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 203, 896)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (166, 204, 896)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 51, 224)-net over F81, using
(166, 203, 3910)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (166, 203, 3910)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3203, 3910, F3, 37) (dual of [3910, 3707, 38]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3203, 6598, F3, 37) (dual of [6598, 6395, 38]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,15]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3193, 6562, F3, 37) (dual of [6562, 6369, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3161, 6562, F3, 31) (dual of [6562, 6401, 32]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−15,−14,…,15}|+1 = 32 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(310, 36, F3, 5) (dual of [36, 26, 6]-code), using
- (u, u−v, u+v+w)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(31, 12, F3, 1) (dual of [12, 11, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(33, 12, F3, 2) (dual of [12, 9, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended Golay code Ge(3) [i]
- linear OA(31, 12, F3, 1) (dual of [12, 11, 2]-code), using
- (u, u−v, u+v+w)-construction [i] based on
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,15]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3203, 6598, F3, 37) (dual of [6598, 6395, 38]-code), using
(166, 203, 853988)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 203, 853989)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (166, 202, 853989)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 390562 330859 349564 628794 215721 901433 799506 496472 950125 950060 813476 549779 452388 956529 028686 535505 > 3202 [i]