Best Known (131, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(131, 210, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 210, 156)-net over F3, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 218, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
(131, 210, 233)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (131, 210, 233)-net over F3, using
(131, 210, 2736)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 210, 2737)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (131, 209, 2737)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5242 544940 205440 275922 222171 301394 307652 782722 961932 412124 402598 521277 028230 778100 742932 754670 900939 > 3209 [i]