Best Known (134, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(134, 210, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 210, 156)-net over F3, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
(134, 210, 260)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (134, 210, 260)-net over F3, using
(134, 210, 3217)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 210, 3218)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 15819 153064 785174 472559 258328 469190 081604 252808 104374 746408 223954 596445 714540 179039 494299 346652 802013 > 3210 [i]