Best Known (143, 212, s)-Nets in Base 3
(143, 212, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 212, 162)-net over F3, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 222, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 111, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 111, 81)-net over F9, using
(143, 212, 361)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (143, 212, 361)-net over F3, using
(143, 212, 6152)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 212, 6153)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 211, 6153)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47185 166565 867176 380286 179003 378966 685574 164675 531839 801345 123138 401137 841012 076884 342500 736397 977945 > 3211 [i]