Best Known (133, 214, s)-Nets in Base 3
(133, 214, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (133, 222, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 111, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 111, 78)-net over F9, using
(133, 214, 232)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (133, 214, 232)-net over F3, using
(133, 214, 2698)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 214, 2699)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 213, 2699)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 425174 583134 955545 552950 716708 457703 983337 923906 002339 986268 463557 313946 482247 503109 757908 455176 132657 > 3213 [i]