Best Known (189, 216, s)-Nets in Base 3
(189, 216, 40879)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (189, 216, 40879)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3216, 40879, F3, 27, 27) (dual of [(40879, 27), 1103517, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3216, 531428, F3, 27) (dual of [531428, 531212, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3216, 531440, F3, 27) (dual of [531440, 531224, 28]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3217, 531441, F3, 28) (dual of [531441, 531224, 29]-code), using
- an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 531440 = 312−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3217, 531441, F3, 28) (dual of [531441, 531224, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3216, 531440, F3, 27) (dual of [531440, 531224, 28]-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3216, 531428, F3, 27) (dual of [531428, 531212, 28]-code), using
(189, 216, 132860)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (189, 216, 132860)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3216, 132860, F3, 4, 27) (dual of [(132860, 4), 531224, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(3216, 531440, F3, 27) (dual of [531440, 531224, 28]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3217, 531441, F3, 28) (dual of [531441, 531224, 29]-code), using
- an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 531440 = 312−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3217, 531441, F3, 28) (dual of [531441, 531224, 29]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(3216, 531440, F3, 27) (dual of [531440, 531224, 28]-code), using
(189, 216, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (189, 216, large)-net in base 3, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (189, 191, large)-net in base 3, but