Best Known (114, 223, s)-Nets in Base 3
(114, 223, 76)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (114, 223, 76)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 69, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 154, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 69, 28)-net over F3, using
(114, 223, 120)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (114, 223, 120)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (113, 223, 120)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 113 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
(114, 223, 907)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (114, 223, 908)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (114, 222, 908)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 8752 512264 650991 118072 157629 937944 292885 706410 767776 816487 150053 024748 794643 681620 500755 282820 312143 453449 > 3222 [i]