Best Known (185, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(185, 226, 896)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (185, 226, 896)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (184, 226, 896)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (184, 228, 896)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 57, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 57, 224)-net over F81, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (184, 228, 896)-net over F3, using
(185, 226, 4318)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (185, 226, 4318)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3226, 4318, F3, 41) (dual of [4318, 4092, 42]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3226, 6579, F3, 41) (dual of [6579, 6353, 42]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,19]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3225, 6562, F3, 43) (dual of [6562, 6337, 44]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−21,−20,…,21}|+1 = 44 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3209, 6562, F3, 39) (dual of [6562, 6353, 40]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−19,−18,…,19}|+1 = 40 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(31, 17, F3, 1) (dual of [17, 16, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,19]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3226, 6579, F3, 41) (dual of [6579, 6353, 42]-code), using
(185, 226, 968013)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (185, 226, 968014)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (185, 225, 968014)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 225052 080572 945606 443175 277042 286982 445579 051561 134083 579116 198368 976750 472223 946927 181414 894538 069239 573929 > 3225 [i]