Best Known (103, 232, s)-Nets in Base 3
(103, 232, 70)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 232, 70)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (103, 69)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 69)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 69)-sequence over F9, using
(103, 232, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (103, 232, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 232, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(103, 232, 589)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 232, 590)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 231, 590)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 171 326018 867479 511537 177420 071080 836434 824272 360554 846522 387824 351942 085687 419627 578120 632213 293505 470410 503809 > 3231 [i]