Best Known (46, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(46, 233, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 233, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 233, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 233, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (46, 233, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 233, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(46, 233, 114)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 233, 115)-net in base 3, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 225, 115)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3225, 115, S3, 2, 179), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 675155 121849 745212 129793 196759 870681 725592 001960 937203 444022 441244 641816 765582 369161 757600 591162 976283 304329 / 2 > 3225 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3225, 115, S3, 2, 179), but