Best Known (142, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(142, 235, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 235, 156)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 240, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 120, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 120, 78)-net over F9, using
(142, 235, 222)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (142, 235, 222)-net over F3, using
(142, 235, 2360)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 235, 2361)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (142, 234, 2361)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4442 317313 759646 244670 010788 477789 617571 598039 578215 578750 659350 096939 573497 793322 431016 339413 123515 071168 930217 > 3234 [i]