Best Known (102, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3
(102, 239, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 239, 69)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 68)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 68)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 68)-sequence over F9, using
(102, 239, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (102, 239, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
(102, 239, 547)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 239, 548)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 238, 548)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 400425 422405 120752 175175 232755 085742 821592 149264 427052 220935 032901 138727 871343 258340 064522 600639 078710 294392 578241 > 3238 [i]