Best Known (133, 242, s)-Nets in Base 3
(133, 242, 86)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 242, 86)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (133, 245, 86)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (32, 88, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 157, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (32, 88, 38)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(133, 242, 159)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (133, 242, 159)-net over F3, using
(133, 242, 1359)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 242, 1360)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 241, 1360)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9 875027 136746 855936 043963 261522 252639 529180 605599 453940 153719 238046 836512 857269 922827 597844 445657 587714 337209 997281 > 3241 [i]