Best Known (128, 243, s)-Nets in Base 3
(128, 243, 84)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 243, 84)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (26, 83, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 160, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 83, 36)-net over F3, using
(128, 243, 139)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (128, 243, 139)-net over F3, using
(128, 243, 1115)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 243, 1116)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (128, 242, 1116)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 310189 617968 969093 934558 160231 627434 849671 862590 859966 649179 008388 598421 736002 177805 936982 034935 749417 389957 306681 > 3242 [i]