Best Known (96, 243, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 243, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 243, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 243, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 243, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 243, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 243, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 243, 465)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 243, 466)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 242, 466)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 930898 824827 507154 698181 811385 367044 811765 898624 385752 331855 709211 821565 300451 445946 609026 782964 049316 898958 232917 > 3242 [i]