Best Known (96, 245, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 245, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 245, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 245, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 245, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 245, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 245, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 245, 461)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 245, 462)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 244, 462)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 280 362389 244107 711350 876388 740911 340286 422378 910087 227411 361630 666703 302468 323747 710248 054686 776136 433503 652735 128941 > 3244 [i]