Best Known (42, 81, s)-Nets in Base 3
(42, 81, 44)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 81, 44)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 44)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 27, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 55, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (7, 27, 16)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(42, 81, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (42, 81, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 81, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(42, 81, 386)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 81, 387)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 80, 387)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 151 104248 295856 861820 588949 568968 962187 > 380 [i]