Best Known (23−19, 23, s)-Nets in Base 32
(23−19, 23, 64)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 23, 64)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (3, 23, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
(23−19, 23, 65)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(4, 23, 65)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 65)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 65)-net over F64, using
(23−19, 23, 71)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (4, 23, 71)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 70)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 71, using
(23−19, 23, 634)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 23, 635)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (4, 22, 635)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1299 367749 756383 699549 970578 862738 > 3222 [i]