Best Known (16, 16+20, s)-Nets in Base 32
(16, 16+20, 128)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 36, 128)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 13, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (3, 23, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (3, 13, 64)-net over F32, using
(16, 16+20, 199)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (16, 36, 199)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3236, 199, F32, 20) (dual of [199, 163, 21]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3236, 205, F32, 20) (dual of [205, 169, 21]-code), using
(16, 16+20, 259)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(16, 36, 259)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 30, 259)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 32, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 32, 259)-net in base 64, using
(16, 16+20, 321)-Net in Base 32
(16, 36, 321)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 30, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 32, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 321)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 32, 321)-net in base 64, using
(16, 16+20, 38291)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 36, 38292)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1 532785 265855 463713 903992 453012 469360 680342 979807 254154 > 3236 [i]