Best Known (39−25, 39, s)-Nets in Base 32
(39−25, 39, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 39, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 39, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(39−25, 39, 146)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (14, 39, 146)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 145)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 146, using
(39−25, 39, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(14, 39, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 42, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 35, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 35, 177)-net over F64, using
(39−25, 39, 9955)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 39, 9956)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 38, 9956)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1570 732818 003405 750650 717303 881930 458364 871749 727943 087272 > 3238 [i]