Best Known (33, 33+39, s)-Nets in Base 32
(33, 33+39, 196)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 72, 196)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 26, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 46, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 26, 98)-net over F32, using
(33, 33+39, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(33, 72, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 84, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
(33, 33+39, 350)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (33, 72, 350)-net over F32, using
(33, 33+39, 107726)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 72, 107727)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 71, 107727)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 73397 384591 461995 197089 670050 080644 315551 295382 535077 472191 629438 670499 764801 210621 944807 518736 524603 474864 > 3271 [i]