Best Known (84−40, 84, s)-Nets in Base 32
(84−40, 84, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 84, 240)-net over F32, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 88, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 33, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 55, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 33, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(84−40, 84, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(44, 84, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (44, 96, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 80, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 80, 513)-net over F64, using
(84−40, 84, 922)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (44, 84, 922)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3284, 922, F32, 40) (dual of [922, 838, 41]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3284, 1047, F32, 40) (dual of [1047, 963, 41]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(39) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- linear OA(3276, 1024, F32, 40) (dual of [1024, 948, 41]-code), using an extension Ce(39) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(3261, 1024, F32, 31) (dual of [1024, 963, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(328, 23, F32, 8) (dual of [23, 15, 9]-code or 23-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(328, 32, F32, 8) (dual of [32, 24, 9]-code or 32-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(24,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(328, 32, F32, 8) (dual of [32, 24, 9]-code or 32-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(39) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3284, 1047, F32, 40) (dual of [1047, 963, 41]-code), using
(84−40, 84, 561780)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 84, 561781)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 707740 571835 929427 550148 721422 727700 263290 670937 289103 478368 590956 396302 382445 050218 242815 242463 522503 428206 847242 736246 828243 > 3284 [i]