Best Known (43, 43+41, s)-Nets in Base 32
(43, 43+41, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 84, 240)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 85, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 32, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 53, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 32, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(43, 43+41, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(43, 84, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 90, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
(43, 43+41, 775)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (43, 84, 775)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3284, 775, F32, 41) (dual of [775, 691, 42]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3284, 1036, F32, 41) (dual of [1036, 952, 42]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,20]) ⊂ C([0,18]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3281, 1025, F32, 41) (dual of [1025, 944, 42]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−20,−19,…,20}|+1 = 42 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3273, 1025, F32, 37) (dual of [1025, 952, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(323, 11, F32, 3) (dual of [11, 8, 4]-code or 11-arc in PG(2,32) or 11-cap in PG(2,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(323, 32, F32, 3) (dual of [32, 29, 4]-code or 32-arc in PG(2,32) or 32-cap in PG(2,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(29,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(323, 32, F32, 3) (dual of [32, 29, 4]-code or 32-arc in PG(2,32) or 32-cap in PG(2,32)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,20]) ⊂ C([0,18]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3284, 1036, F32, 41) (dual of [1036, 952, 42]-code), using
(43, 43+41, 472397)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 84, 472398)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 83, 472398)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 84616 839348 128450 133930 050114 808428 265805 646902 966966 128065 069051 161266 524643 106000 756306 389579 967384 186813 392717 012973 695196 > 3283 [i]