Best Known (46, 46+43, s)-Nets in Base 32
(46, 46+43, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 89, 240)-net over F32, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 94, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 35, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 59, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 35, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(46, 46+43, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(46, 89, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
(46, 46+43, 866)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (46, 89, 866)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3289, 866, F32, 43) (dual of [866, 777, 44]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3289, 1047, F32, 43) (dual of [1047, 958, 44]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(42) ⊂ Ce(34) [i] based on
- linear OA(3282, 1024, F32, 43) (dual of [1024, 942, 44]-code), using an extension Ce(42) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,42], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- linear OA(3266, 1024, F32, 35) (dual of [1024, 958, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(327, 23, F32, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(25,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(42) ⊂ Ce(34) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3289, 1047, F32, 43) (dual of [1047, 958, 44]-code), using
(46, 46+43, 568090)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 89, 568091)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 88, 568091)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 839220 760889 431087 371836 947399 003780 646354 278821 915392 330350 742908 083495 655313 886820 192256 302887 119123 209102 618275 810923 192816 204684 > 3288 [i]