Best Known (33, 33+44, s)-Nets in Base 32
(33, 33+44, 162)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 77, 162)-net over F32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 79, 162)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 26, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 53, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (3, 26, 64)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(33, 33+44, 275)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (33, 77, 275)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3277, 275, F32, 2, 44) (dual of [(275, 2), 473, 45]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,499P) ⊂ AG(2;F,503P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(3274, 272, F32, 2, 44) (dual of [(272, 2), 470, 45]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,499P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- linear OOA(3270, 272, F32, 2, 40) (dual of [(272, 2), 474, 41]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,503P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273 (see above)
- linear OOA(323, 3, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(323, 32, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(32, 2), 61, 4]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;61,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(323, 32, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(32, 2), 61, 4]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,499P) ⊂ AG(2;F,503P) [i] based on
(33, 33+44, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(33, 77, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 84, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
(33, 33+44, 342)-Net in Base 32
(33, 77, 342)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 78, 342)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 65, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 65, 342)-net over F64, using
(33, 33+44, 54128)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 77, 54129)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 78 818672 504996 930691 142864 660802 784652 250250 580142 419739 744683 182449 516678 050389 158327 723735 840894 102618 325989 544464 > 3277 [i]