Best Known (95−47, 95, s)-Nets in Base 32
(95−47, 95, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 95, 240)-net over F32, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 100, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 63, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(95−47, 95, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(48, 95, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 95, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(95−47, 95, 772)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (48, 95, 772)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3295, 772, F32, 47) (dual of [772, 677, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3295, 1041, F32, 47) (dual of [1041, 946, 48]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(40) [i] based on
- linear OA(3290, 1024, F32, 47) (dual of [1024, 934, 48]-code), using an extension Ce(46) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,46], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(3278, 1024, F32, 41) (dual of [1024, 946, 42]-code), using an extension Ce(40) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,40], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 41 [i]
- linear OA(325, 17, F32, 5) (dual of [17, 12, 6]-code or 17-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(27,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(40) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3295, 1041, F32, 47) (dual of [1041, 946, 48]-code), using
(95−47, 95, 431087)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 95, 431088)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 94, 431088)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3048 688652 439764 923791 753357 181901 164660 526325 718313 197746 683755 413124 860023 412757 232781 039209 218821 826202 296228 364519 437424 229719 735134 722942 > 3294 [i]