Best Known (20, 20+47, s)-Nets in Base 32
(20, 20+47, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 67, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 67, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(20, 20+47, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(20, 67, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 78, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
(20, 20+47, 177)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (20, 67, 177)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 176)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
(20, 20+47, 6330)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 67, 6331)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 66, 6331)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2193 759120 694319 084522 514832 156284 700112 019303 344700 545020 207668 482147 932848 423899 550774 951412 165704 > 3266 [i]