Best Known (94−48, 94, s)-Nets in Base 32
(94−48, 94, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 94, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 35, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 59, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 35, 120)-net over F32, using
(94−48, 94, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(46, 94, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
(94−48, 94, 621)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (46, 94, 621)-net over F32, using
(94−48, 94, 248399)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 94, 248400)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3048 794798 804654 323258 851586 627991 072007 892981 093084 223661 861456 768902 684474 781867 286874 278550 282507 955671 144074 798488 497916 062256 422212 459996 > 3294 [i]