Best Known (88−51, 88, s)-Nets in Base 32
(88−51, 88, 174)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 88, 174)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 30, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 58, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (5, 30, 76)-net over F32, using
(88−51, 88, 277)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (37, 88, 277)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3288, 277, F32, 2, 51) (dual of [(277, 2), 466, 52]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3288, 279, F32, 2, 51) (dual of [(279, 2), 470, 52]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,492P) ⊂ AG(2;F,500P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(3281, 272, F32, 2, 51) (dual of [(272, 2), 463, 52]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,492P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- linear OOA(3273, 272, F32, 2, 43) (dual of [(272, 2), 471, 44]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,500P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273 (see above)
- linear OOA(327, 7, F32, 2, 7) (dual of [(7, 2), 7, 8]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(327, 32, F32, 2, 7) (dual of [(32, 2), 57, 8]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;57,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(327, 32, F32, 2, 7) (dual of [(32, 2), 57, 8]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,492P) ⊂ AG(2;F,500P) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3288, 279, F32, 2, 51) (dual of [(279, 2), 470, 52]-NRT-code), using
(88−51, 88, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(37, 88, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 98, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 70, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 70, 288)-net over F128, using
(88−51, 88, 342)-Net in Base 32
(37, 88, 342)-net in base 32, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 102, 342)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 85, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 85, 342)-net over F64, using
(88−51, 88, 56765)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 88, 56766)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 87, 56766)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 88726 432567 131930 303240 755466 052674 163407 869894 989492 095067 075394 583966 762365 828461 239273 066570 593783 173347 211551 070843 906540 902347 > 3287 [i]