Best Known (20, 20+55, s)-Nets in Base 32
(20, 20+55, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 75, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 75, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(20, 20+55, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(20, 75, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 78, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
(20, 20+55, 177)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (20, 75, 177)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 176)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
(20, 20+55, 4688)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 75, 4689)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 74, 4689)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2418 596288 680599 817118 023813 251378 865252 867306 392917 859652 537278 543266 066867 110361 464071 422251 965385 897780 182976 > 3274 [i]