MinT - Best Known (50, 50+55, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (50, 50+55, s)-Nets in Base 32

(50, 50+55, 240)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (50, 105, 240)-net over F₃₂, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 106, 240)-net over F₃₂, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (11, 39, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. digital (11, 67, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂ (see above)

(50, 50+55, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(50, 105, 513)-net in base 32, using

t-expansion [i] based on (46, 105, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
        the Hermitian function field over F₆₄ [i]

(50, 50+55, 574)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (50, 105, 574)-net over F₃₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(50, 50+55, 221122)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (50, 105, 221123)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 104, 221123)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 3 432687 402852 005826 373850 618538 223879 507049 435849 157635 041814 966392 170727 234936 531141 725010 443423 488646 039886 851292 076085 153830 698808 165693 464076 072239 565248 > 32¹⁰⁴ [i]