Best Known (2, 2+56, s)-Nets in Base 32
(2, 2+56, 44)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (2, 58, 44)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (1, 58, 44)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
(2, 2+56, 53)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (2, 58, 53)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 52)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 53, using
(2, 2+56, 247)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (2, 58, 248)-net in base 32, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (2, 55, 248)-net in base 32, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3255, 248, S32, 53), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16062 875815 361622 591832 993088 417824 992293 220291 564835 849555 692861 231558 994841 916425 250457 423034 762815 078400 / 262402 337018 559377 249213 > 3255 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3255, 248, S32, 53), but