Best Known (90−57, 90, s)-Nets in Base 32
(90−57, 90, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 90, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 90, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(90−57, 90, 216)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(33, 90, 216)-net in base 32, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 98, 216)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 70, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 70, 216)-net over F128, using
(90−57, 90, 273)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (33, 90, 273)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (30, 90, 273)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
(90−57, 90, 281)-Net in Base 32
(33, 90, 281)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (18, 75, 281)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 281, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
(90−57, 90, 22160)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 90, 22161)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 89, 22161)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 90 863236 636751 106212 748293 455851 924855 456979 963120 544046 860085 635012 217172 657871 268065 462397 887513 447405 352370 612127 651737 342530 847584 > 3289 [i]