Best Known (20, 20+59, s)-Nets in Base 32
(20, 20+59, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 79, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 79, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(20, 20+59, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(20, 79, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 90, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 128)-net over F64, using
(20, 20+59, 177)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (20, 79, 177)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 176)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
(20, 20+59, 4193)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 79, 4194)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 78, 4194)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2534 612791 878513 803513 231100 915941 566675 718414 006558 750901 115223 137980 479621 839325 957903 824786 102983 626302 199345 754328 > 3278 [i]