Best Known (29, 29+60, s)-Nets in Base 32
(29, 29+60, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 89, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 89, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(29, 29+60, 192)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(29, 89, 192)-net in base 32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 91, 192)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 65, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 65, 192)-net over F128, using
(29, 29+60, 257)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (29, 89, 257)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 89, 257)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 256)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 256)-sequence over F32, using
(29, 29+60, 11326)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 89, 11327)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 90 868229 256026 661179 854089 060446 306900 395753 085682 596325 209456 473328 408354 139824 963870 984817 310575 295925 427480 185233 555596 517152 872835 > 3289 [i]