Best Known (23, 23+73, s)-Nets in Base 32
(23, 23+73, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 96, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 96, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 23+73, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(23, 96, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(23, 23+73, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (23, 96, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 96, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 23+73, 4299)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 96, 4300)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 95, 4300)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 97947 248939 556686 934336 264100 156780 397664 994223 064690 213569 424429 158668 309816 292759 914623 378368 281187 708710 230678 687688 509241 994051 766511 383988 > 3295 [i]