Best Known (23, 23+85, s)-Nets in Base 32
(23, 23+85, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 108, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 108, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 23+85, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(23, 108, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 90, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
(23, 23+85, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (23, 108, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 108, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 23+85, 3617)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 108, 3618)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 107, 3618)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 113475 773273 331660 610531 419364 967228 108053 875748 487718 637364 592061 122612 036355 125353 157494 844407 214565 619579 199017 928245 296205 747540 475015 401274 673739 926272 777984 > 32107 [i]