Best Known (15−9, 15, s)-Nets in Base 32
(15−9, 15, 88)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 15, 88)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 5, 44)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (1, 10, 44)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (1, 5, 44)-net over F32, using
(15−9, 15, 97)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (6, 15, 97)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3215, 97, F32, 9) (dual of [97, 82, 10]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([92,6]), C2 = C([0,7]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,6]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([92,7]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3213, 93, F32, 8) (dual of [93, 80, 9]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 93 | 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,6}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(3213, 93, F32, 8) (dual of [93, 80, 9]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 93 | 322−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(3215, 93, F32, 9) (dual of [93, 78, 10]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 93 | 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,7}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(3211, 93, F32, 7) (dual of [93, 82, 8]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 93 | 322−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([92,6]), C2 = C([0,7]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,6]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([92,7]) [i] based on
(15−9, 15, 257)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(6, 15, 257)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 16, 257)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
(15−9, 15, 13233)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 15, 13234)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 14, 13234)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1180 902033 675388 858692 > 3214 [i]