MinT - Best Known (29, 102, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (29, 102, s)-Nets in Base 32

(29, 102, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (29, 102, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 102, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(29, 102, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(29, 102, 177)-net in base 32, using

t-expansion [i] based on (25, 102, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(29, 102, 257)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (29, 102, 257)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 102, 257)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 256)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(29, 102, 7675)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (29, 102, 7676)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 101, 7676)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 105 023942 805923 470196 208837 432240 450976 495935 172715 609556 028907 363711 622174 222904 181220 264143 560121 147725 664884 269481 326870 477102 095074 986868 792375 924382 > 32¹⁰¹ [i]