Best Known (12, 29, s)-Nets in Base 32
(12, 29, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 29, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 29, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(12, 29, 129)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (12, 29, 129)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 128)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
(12, 29, 257)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(12, 29, 257)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 32, 257)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 257)-net over F256, using
(12, 29, 22505)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 29, 22506)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 28, 22506)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1 394246 685017 097735 700762 467865 703405 180669 > 3228 [i]