Best Known (26, 59, s)-Nets in Base 32
(26, 59, 162)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 59, 162)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 19, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 40, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (3, 19, 64)-net over F32, using
(26, 59, 250)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (26, 59, 250)-net over F32, using
(26, 59, 260)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(26, 59, 260)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 60, 260)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (16, 50, 260)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 52, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 39, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 39, 260)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 52, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (16, 50, 260)-net in base 64, using
(26, 59, 321)-Net in Base 32
(26, 59, 321)-net in base 32, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 64, 321)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 40, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 40, 321)-net over F256, using
(26, 59, 62703)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 59, 62704)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 58, 62704)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1989 663770 052748 521381 425239 324250 999243 040995 123963 070760 093419 827636 699523 901384 110870 > 3258 [i]